Skip to main content

Screen printed tees

I've been making heavy use of long-sleeve tee shirts on this project, and I'm running low. So I thought, if I'm going to buy more, why buy a shirt with a goofy fake brand plastered all over the front, when I could plaster our own brand!?

But printing a one-off tee at customink run $40. Think of the money I could save if I spent a hundred bucks on screen printing equipment to do it myself! And now that we're buying tees, let's amortize all this trouble and print tees for all the family and maybe all the friends who visit...

(At this point, it would have been cheaper to hire a screen printing company to print a couple dozen shirts, but that would be missing the point. When Howells DIY something, apparently we also DIY the parts of that thing. Reminiscent of buying an embroidery machine to manufacture patches for space suits for the rocket...)

My first try was to make a mask on the vinyl cutter at work. It didn't stick very well to the nylon screen, but it did make a few successful prints:


Not being very sticky, the ink ended up squirting under the vinyl. It survived one effort at washing it off, but on the second try, the vinyl came off the screen.

Okay, let's do this the official way. I bought real photo-sensitive emulsion, mixed up a batch, spread it on the screen in my dark basement, then tucked it under a box in the dark storage room to dry off overnight. This morning I woke up and realized that the storage room was only dark because it was, you know, night last night. Well, there's still the box. I exposed the image onto the screen with 210W of photo lamps for 12 minutes, and went to wash off the unexposed emulsion:


I sprayed and sprayed, but by the time I got a hole in the screen, it started peeling too much off. Okay, so that didn't work. I suspect three things went wrong:

  1. the inadvertent exposure made the open parts of the screen stick too well,
  2. the 12 minute exposure wasn't quite enough, so the solid parts came loose, and/or
  3. the emulsion was way too thick, so the parts of the exposed emulsion adjacent to the screen didn't set well enough.
So I cleaned the screen, dried it off with a fan, then spread new emulsion, being careful to keep the layer as thin as I could. I used tarps to make my bike room into a darkroom, and dried that layer for a couple hours. Then I exposed it with the photo lights for 30 minutes.

This time, I could see the contrast between the dark blue-green exposed areas and the light green unexposed image. I sprayed it for quite a few minutes before the first hole appeared, but with persistence, eventually the image separated off successfully:



I put the screen up in the window to dry off and to be sure the mask was completely exposed and not likely to come unstuck during printing.

I haven't printed with this one yet, but I think it's likely to survive for plenty of prints.

However, I wasn't very excited to be back in a 1990s darkroom, fiddling with finicky photochemicals. I'd love to find a direct process to create the screen resist. I'm thinking of trying to lay down PLA with my 3D printer, or maybe using a laser cutter to make the screen from a sheet of mylar.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

It is DONE!

The final inspection was today. This guy is Levi, the county inspector, and as you can see, we passed! He only had two questions for me. One was about the energy efficiency credits and the blower door test, for which I had the compensating paperwork for the low-flow faucets already prepared. The second was asking for a smoke detector outside the bedroom; I pointed up and he saw that we already had one tucked into the alcove. And that was that! I got up at 5am to be certain I'd be here before the inspector, and I was ... by about five hours. In that time, I took another truckload of tool buckets down to the storage container, then picked up all the floor protection in the great room and vacuumed and mopped. It's glowing! Then I went back down to the storage container to get a hammer so I could glue in 32 wood plugs to cover the screws for the french doors. I fought with installing the screens, but the frames are too big! The manufacturer said "yeah we don't even make th...

Odds and ends

I made progress on a bunch of little things today.  I painted a fencepost in 12" segments and pounded it in at the property line, where the outdoor camera can see it. Now we can measure the snow accumulation. I worked on finishing up almost-complete receptacle branch circuits. The first one I worked on was a little mystery: all the receptacles were installed, but the power didn't reach past a certain point in the line. After some investigation with a wire tracer and watching through the videos we took before covering the walls, I worked out what had happened: two receptacles shared a stud bay, facing into opposite rooms. The plan had been to bring power up to one box, jump over to the other box, and continue back down to the crawlspace to the next box. We forgot the jumper. I couldn't fish a wire between the boxes myself, so that repair waits. Upstairs, installing two receptacles completed the branch. The bathroom vent hole in the tile backer board was a skosh too small. ...

Energy efficiency testing

I came up after work to meet Brian, the contractor who is doing our blower door test: In this test, a big fan pumps air out of the house at a prescribed pressure differential, and then the air flow rate is measured in cubic feet per minute, then converted to whole house air changes per hour. The maximum limit is 5.0, and we scored that. Hooray! Brian said that we'd done a pretty solid job sealing the house, especially for an owner-built house; getting extremely tight seals requires careful awareness of the sealing challenges at every stage of construction. Another thing I learned by building a house. While I was up there, I got most of the way through installing a heat pump water heater to comply with energy efficiency requirements I re-discovered when looking up the blower door test requirements. This is all a bit silly. For our application -- a house occupied infrequently -- the on-demand heater is the best efficiency tradeoff, because it has zero standby waste. Unfortunately, th...